국가정보화투자의 효율성 분석과 미래 국가정보화 전략의 재정립

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I. Research background and purpose□Research background○Since the 1990`s, a paradigm of government management has been moving from “input and process” to “outcome and performance”. For this reason, informatization investment is gradually changing to focus on “outcome and performance”.○There is a need to study the efficiency of national information policies and their ripple effects, and to direct national information policies based on this strategic analysis.□Research purpose○The first aim of this study is to confirm the validity of the government`s investment in informatization.○The second aim of this study is to establish national policy directions for future informatization through the efficiency analysis.II. Major issues and Analysis□Major issues○How is investment and business being pushed forward in national informatization in major countries?○How does the efficiency of national informatization investment and business show up in advanced countries?○How does the efficiency of national informatization investment show up in Korea?○What are the problems and alternatives for the efficiency of national informatization investment in Korea?□The results and implications of empirical analysis on the efficiency of informatization investment○Analysis implications- The efficiency of investment in informatization is high in Scandinavian countries.- These countries think positively about the importance of IT.- This positive thought leads to a budget for investment in IT. On average, the IT budget in Scandinavian countries has been increased by 4.3% from last year.- In particular, the ICT public sector shows as much growth as the ICT private sector in Scandinavian countries. In doing so, local governments are showing strong growth.- A look at the latest trends in IT financial investment in Scandinavian countries suggests that IT investments on security are most preferred.○The results regarding the efficiency of Korea`s e- government 31st business are listed below- In general, the relative efficiency is high in the field of enhancing public services across 10 agendas, but the efficiency of enhancing enterprise services is relatively low.- In short, a business whose efficiency is low is referred to as one whose utilization is low in comparison to business funds.- It is necessary that projects focused on services most often used by people be prioritized.- By the way, services that companies provide are very weak. Thus, there is a need for plans to activate these businesses.○Discussion- The efficiency in informatization investments is not so bad in Korea, but to improve further, it is essential that each part of the constructed system be well- used.- In spite of the use rate of Korea`s e- Government service ranking No.1 by global e- Government evaluation three years in a row, it is reported that the occupancy rate is only 41.1%, lower than that of Denmark (63%), Singapore (53%), and America (44%).- This is because the use rate in service usage is relatively low compared to e- government recognition (83%).□Economic analysis of informatization among OECD nations.○Informatization is significantly associated with a country`s growth competitiveness, and Korea belongs to a group of nations for which the correlation between ICT competitiveness and GDP per person is high (correlation coefficients: 0.0848, significant level 0.01).○A nation`s growth competitiveness is significantly associated with ICT competitiveness (correlation coefficients 0.885, significant level 0.01). However, Korea has lower national competitiveness when compared to countries that have reached ICT competitive levels, similar to Korea`s.○The interrelationship between ICT investment growth and practical GDP growth is the highest (correlation coefficients 0.730, significant level 0.01). In Korea, added value has a greater gravity for the IT industry, which leads to a higher practical GDP per person (correlation coefficients: 0.789, significant level: 0.01).○However, there is one point that should draw our attention. That the IT industry plays a bigger role in the whole industry doesn`t indicate that practical GDP per person is high (correlation coefficients: 0.421, significant level: 0.073).○It shows that investment is most effective in the order of Portugal, Australia, America, and New Zealand, when compared to GDP growth rate adjusted ICT investment contributions between the periods 1995 to 2003 and 1990 to 1995.- On the other hand, it shows that in the rest of the world, like Scandinavian countries and Japan, GDP growth rate adjusted ICT investment contributions are below average.III. Policy alternatives: Advice for the establishment of investment strategy in future national informatization.