KCI등재
1950년대 모더니즘시의 자아표출 방식 연구 = A Study on Methods of Self-Expression in the 1950s' Modernism Poetry - Concentrated on Kim Su-yeong and Kim Chun-su
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
59-93(35쪽)
DOI식별코드
제공처
This study has assumed that it was due to the difference between Kim Su-yeong and Kim Chun-su in methods of self-expression that the two poets were able to different poetic worlds while sharing some features of the 50s' Modernism Poetry, and investigated in what aspects methods of self-expression were developed in their poems.
As for ways of their ego response to the world, Kim Su-yeong pursued identification of his ego with the world, while Kim Chun-su internalization through identification of the world with his ego. Whereas Kim Su-yeong internalized father's moral attitude or values, Kim Chun-su attempted to grossly internalize not only father but also family and distant antecedents.
With Oedipus Complex, father oppresses mother by his power and in his patriarchic recognition, and son also internalizes father. With archetypical collective unconsciousness, however, the internalization of father is weakened. This is because the object of the internalization are not limited to father, but grossly are extended to include others. Mother also is treated in different ways with Oedipus Complex and with archetypical collective unconsciousness. That is to say, while, with Oedipus Complex, mother finds her place as an oppressed existence, with archetypical collective unconsciousness, she, as the origin of the generic archetype, has comprehensive meaning embracing family, homeland, and nature. Thus, as mather is a main arche-image in Kim Chun-su's poems and embraces family, homeland, and nature, we can say that the three are arche-images in Kim Chun-su's poems. Kim Su-yeong's internalization of the world and his ego proceeded due to historical situations and necessities, and hence his complex was naturally cured. For Kim Chun-su, however, the internalization of the world and his ego was due to his personal history, and his wounds resulted from the times and the history were overcome not socially but through shift toward archetypical collective unconsciousness.
Kim Su-yeong and Kim Chun-su came to explore the present existence, death, and language through Heidegger and Rilke. The present existence called man is the existence that should realize death through limited time. Thus, it pursues internalization of the world, and man, who has begun to communicate with the world, becomes to need communicationwith others by extending the range of communication. Here, as the ego needs language for communicating with the world and with others, language plays an important role in the ego's forming of the sense of existence as an existence within the world. Man, who has become to be an existence within the world through language, proceeds to make history living his/her own inherent time. Whereas Kim Su-yeong found history in such time, Kim Chun-su gradually made time (history) extinguish in his works due to the historical violence.
Though they attempted internalization of their ego and the world, due to their different responsive methods, Kim Su-yeong pursued identification of his ego with the world, but KimChun-su internalization through identification of the world with his ego. In their relationship with others, Kim Su-yeong attempted at communication within a limited range, but Kim Chun-su in an entire range. Due to such the two poets' differences in internalization method and range, Kim Su-yeong communicated with a limited world through identification of the world with his ego, and through this attempted to extend the revolutionary spirit and free will. On the other hand, we can find out that Kim Chun-su communicates with the entire world through the identification of his ego with the world, and through this attempted at extension toward exploration of existence and the idealist world.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)