1970년대 미술가들의 정체성 찾기：'한국적인 것'과 '동양적인 것'의 착종과 접합 = Seeking the Identity of 1970s South Korean Artists: The Entangling and Hybridization of 'the Korean' and 'the Eastern'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper explores how South Korean artists in the 1970s constructed the identity of Korean art and whether their art actually was ‘Korean’ during this period of extreme nationalism. It deals with the 1970s de-Westernization of South Korean artists, who, up until the late-1960s had actively embraced various Western avant-garde art movements and approaches such as geometrical abstraction, happening, pop art, and op-art. This paper navigates different fields of production, including sculpture, installation, and monotone painting. The artists highlighted here commonly shared an aim of “anti-representationalsim” (talpyohyun) regardless of their formal genre. This tendency was derived from the ideology of Daoism (Lao-Zhuang Philosophy) which emphasized asceticism aesthetics of “Nature of Doing Nothing” (muyujayeon) and was distinctly distinguished from a specific Korean tradition. In this context, this paper considers the emergence of anti-representationalism in the 1970s, at this moment when artists attempted to establish a specific identity for Korean art. The paper focuses on Lee Ufan, a well-known Korean Mono-ha theorist in Japan at the time. Even though Mono-ha theory was based on Daoism (a wider East Asian tradition, and not specifically Korean), many Korean artists were attracted to Lee Ufan’s Mono-ha aesthetics because of his nationality. However, a more fundamental reason for this convergence was that in the late 1960s Japan had tried to break away from Western cultural hegemony, creating a situation similar to that of 1970s South Korea, where people desired to create a specific idea of ‘Korean art’ through de-Westernization. The 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea first led to active cultural exchanges between Japan and South Korea. As a result, the Korean art community was able to break away from the anti-Japanese atmosphere that had been strongly cultivated in the aftermath of post-colonial independence since 1945. These artists recognized Japanese culture as an ‘effective cultural channel’ and even demanded the area of cultural coexistence between Korea and Japan.’ They expected the formation of a common art community with Japan to overcome Western hegemony in Asia. In this respect, 1970s South Korean artists collaborated with Japanese artists by using the West as their shared antithetical Other, and help answer the historical demand of the Korean people to locate the identity of Korean art. Therefore, Korean artists did not necessarily distinguish ‘the Eastern’ (or East Asian) from ‘the Korean.’ In this circumstance, seeking the identity of Korean art served as a device to help create a wider imaginary cultural community.
This paper argues that one of the most important formative features of monotone painting was not the use of ‘white’ but the concern with ‘anti-representationalsim.’ Although the use of ‘white’ has long been critically established as a signature nationally specific interest of the monotone painting movement, South Korean monotone painters in fact did not recognize ‘white’ as a tradition to inherit or propagate, nor did they pay particular attention to the color itself. Therefore, this paper argues that it is inaccurate to label the exhibition Korea: Five Artists, Five Whites held at the Donggyeong art gallery in 1975 as the starting point of Korean monochrome painting, or to name ‘monochorme painting as “Dansaekhwa.”

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이 일, "현대회화 ’70년대의 흐름" 워커힐미술관 1988
• 2 "해프닝과 이벤트: 1960-70년대 한국의 행위미술" ACC 2016
• 3 오상길, "한국현대미술 다시 읽기 III vol.2" ICAS 2003
• 4 김미경, "한국의 실험미술" 시공사 2003
• 5 김이순, "한국의 근현대미술" 조형교육 2007
• 6 신나경, "한국미의 범주로서의 ‘자연’" 2007
• 7 홍선표, "한국 현대미술사에서 ‘단색조 회화’의 연구 동향" 한국미술연구소 (50) : 7-27, 2020
• 8 윤진이, "한국 모노크롬미술의 ‘정체성담론’에 대한 탈식민주의적 고찰" 인문학연구원 (63) : 115-147, 2010
• 9 "평면작업의 새 차원, 박서보의 “묘법전”"
• 10 "특집 • 한국작가들의 해외전: 일본전시회 작가 좌담" 명동화랑 1974
• 11 박서보, "추상운동 10년 그 유산과 전망" 14 : 1967
• 12 "창조의 순간:〈묘법〉을 향한 끝없는 반복"
• 13 "참여작가 中 21인의 辯: 하종현 ‘자연스러움을 찾아서’" 179 : 1982
• 14 이 일, "이일 미술평론집: 한국미술, 그 오늘의 얼굴" 공간사 1982
• 15 이 일, "이일 미술비평일지" 미진사 1998
• 16 이우환, "여백의 예술" 현대문학 2002
• 17 "세 번째 개인전을 ‘도꾜’서, 서양화가 박서보씨"
• 18 이 일, "서양으로부터의 영향에 의해 변용한 아시아미술의 전통과 앞으로의 과제:《아시아현대미술전》기념심포지엄 한국현대미술 주제 발표문" 163 : 1981
• 19 "색채는 ‘감정’이고 ‘자산’이다"
• 20 "미협회원전"
• 21 김미경, "모노하의 길에서 만난 이우환" 공간사 2006
• 22 서성록, "단색화 미학을 말하다" 마로니에북스 2015
• 23 박서보, "단상 노트에서" 125 : 1977
• 24 이강수, "노자의 무위자연 사상" 5 : 1977
• 25 "나는 표현 불가능한 화가"
• 26 박서보, "김창열과의 관포지교(管포鮑之交)" 6 : 1974
• 27 이우환, "巴里비엔날 序文" 47 : 1971
• 28 "奇想天外의 아이디어전: 7회 파리비엔날레"
• 29 강태희, "‘한국적 미니멀리즘’과 이우환" 11 : 1997
• 30 이 일, "<한국 · 현대미술의 단면>展" 123 : 1977
• 31 구진경, "1970년대 한국 단색화 운동과 국제화" 성신여자대학교 대학원 2015
• 32 김이순, "1970~80년대 한국 추상미술과 물성(materiality)" 미술사학연구회 (35) : 139-170, 2010
• 33 좌 담, "1960~70년대 한국의 실험미술: AG, ST, 대구현대미술제 이강소 대담" 국립현대미술관 8 : 2016