KCI등재
濊貊族에 關한 硏究 = A Study of Ye Maek(濊ㆍ貊) Tribe
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1968
작성언어
-KDC
900
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
1-49(49쪽)
제공처
It is well-known that the Ye Maek(the tribe of Huei-Mai) is an ancestor of Korean people. Now, there is no objection about it. The present tendency of arguing about this problem, however, has divided into two opinions-that is as to whether the Huei-Mai separates the Huei from the Mai, or the Huei-Mai regards itself as one tribe. About this problem, there have been many dissertations by domestic or alien scholars, but there is yet no any consistence of opinions in several theories. Most Korean and Chinese scholars tend to regard the Huei-Mai as one tribe, while some Japanese and Chinese scholars tend to separate it. Since the period of pre-Ch’in, however, if one examines the Chinese records under the Age of Ch’un-Ch’iu Chan-Kuo (春秋戰國) and the reign of Han, one comes to understand that the Huei and Mai would be separated. The two are one homogeneous tribe, but never just the heterogeneous one that Professor Mikami(三上) has insisted on. It is reasonable to view that this classification would result from considering the regional distribution. The territories in which the Huei Tribe lived have to be viewed as the eastern part of the Korean Peninsula and the southern tract of Manchuria, while the territories of the Mai have to be considered as the northern part of the Korean Peninsula and furthermore, Chinese Shantung and Liaotung neighbourhood. As an archaeological specimen about it, a wine-vessel called ‘Mai-tse-yu(貉子卣)’, excavated in Shou-kuan Hsien(壽光縣), Shantung Province, proves that the Mai Tribe lived in the Shantung Province. As has already been told, without the consideration of the racial distribution concerned with the regions, the problem about the tribe of Huei-Mai would not have solved. Of course, as the days had passed, even though their residence area had moved to the Korean Peninsula by the pressure of Chinese people, the tribes of Huei and Mai all did not move to the Korean Peninsula. Therefore, nowadays, as for the territories of the Huei, they are not always a part of Kangwon Province, Korea, of which some of us often remind.
Until now, as to the Korean people, there have been many theories, which they are sometimes called the Tungus, the Paleo-Asiatic, or a group of Chinese people, but as a matter of fact, the Korean people do not belong to their groups. Since they had had quite different histories from ancient times, the Huei and Mai have to be identified among some tribes different from them. As the tribal problem has a direct relationship with the origin of the Korean people and culture, it is important that the archaeological theories concerned with the Huei and Mai will be examined.
Professor Mikami, regarding the Huei and Mai as separate tribes,dilated some archaeological meanings upon them. It is well known that in the prehistoric culture of Korea there are two systematic streams: they are the undecorated pottery and the ornamented pottery. Thus, based upon the above archaeological theory, Professor Mikami had insisted the theory that the Huei Tribe was the owner of ornamented pottery and the Mai Tribe the owner of undecorated pottery. However, according to the records concerned, the Huei and Mai had been nearly in the same period; on the contrary, since the ornamented pottery was in chronological order earlier than the undecorated pottery, the combination of both will be impossible. It is furthermore embarrassed because there are a great deal of spaces of time between the age of ornamented pottery and the records of the Huei.
Perhaps having been influenced by Professor Mikami, Wen Ch’ung-I(文崇一) insisted that the tribes of Huei and Mai, as one tribe, should be the owner of black pottery. This theory will be worthy of note, with the combination of the Mai tribe and the undecorated pottery, because this culture has a relationship with the period of the Huei and Mai.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)