20세기 초반 재중유학생(在中留學生) 정래동(丁來東)의 신문학 인식과 전파 = The Understandings and Spreads of New Literature of Jeong Raedong, a Korean Student in China for the Early 20th Century

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This essay is to grasp the understandings and spreads of modern sciences and thoughts focusing on Jeong Raedong(丁來東) who studied in Beijing during the Japanese Imperial Occupation and was a 1st generation scholar of contemporary Chinese literature. Jeong Raedong, who majored in English literature and accepted anarchism while being enrolled in Minguo University(民國大學), studied contemporary Chinese literature besides his class works and circulated it.
At that time, Korean literary world emphasized only the western literature re-translated from Japanese and subordinated Chinese literature. Regarding such trends, Jeong Raedong, based on modern sciences and thoughts that he personally studied during his studying in Beijing and on his personal exchanges, widely introduced and spreaded ‘New Literature.’ He pointed out Hu Shi(胡適) and Chen Duxiu(陳獨秀) as the proponents of Chinese literary revolution, and Lu Xun(魯迅) as its activist. In his criticism on New Literature, He opposed Marxist literature, but supported anarchist literature propagating ‘free will’; and thought that the rolls of comic plays were important to dissect and expose social phenomena in China in order to build just society. Especially, he emphasized the importance of translated literature to rapidly and effectively accept western literature. Ultimately, he pursued anarchism, which doesn’t depend on any specific political ideology and emphasizes a human-being’s natural free will, and the People’s Literature(民衆文學), which describes people’s lives in people’s languages. He thought that the shortcut to it was the modern western thoughts and literature, which were imported to China and transformed there.
Jeong Raedong was not satisfied with mere observation into the Chinese literary world, but enthusiastically grasped the whole figure of it by recording each and every scene related to the Chinese literary world. Thus, besides his class works, he ideologically combined anarchist activities and focused on introducing trends and literary pieces of the Chinese literary world. For the result, the acceptance of Chinese contemporary literature by Jeong Raedong was simultaneous, and was systematic and full-scale in genres and contents. Based on his fluent linguistic abilities and intense field experiences, he attained modern sciences and thoughts, refused literature influenced by social classes and political powers, and spread the people’s literature for freedom and liberation. In this way, Joseon’s literary world and intellectual society around 1930’s could build the foundation for modern knowledge by importing new sciences and literary trends through another route, which was China.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 박남용, "金光洲의 중국 체험과 중국 신문학의 소개, 번역과 수용" 중국연구소 47 : 135-153, 2009
• 2 백지운, "한국의 1세대 중국문학 연구의 두 얼굴 ―정내동과 이명선" 대동문화연구원 (68) : 397-422, 2009
• 3 김시준, "한국에서의 중국현대문학연구 개황과 전망" 중국어문학회 (4) : 1-8, 1997
• 4 후궈시, "차이위안페이평전" 김영사 2009
• 5 "조선일보"
• 6 방평, "정래동 연구 : 중국현대문학의 소개와 번역을 중심으로" 서강대학교 대학원 2012
• 7 박남용, "일제 시기 중국 현대소설의 국내 번역과 수용" 중국어문논역학회 (24) : 305-325, 2009
• 8 정선경, "양건식의 중국신문학운동 수용과 번역의 태도" 중국어문학연구회 (79) : 417-448, 2013
• 9 "동아일보"
• 10 "동명"
• 11 최병우, "김광주의 상하이 체험과 그 문학적 형상화 연구" 28 : 2005
• 12 무정부주의운동사편찬위원회, "韓國아나키즘運動史" 형설출판사 1978
• 13 후스, "胡適選集 歷史" 文星書店 1966
• 14 張硏, "民國史料叢刊 1061 文敎·高等敎育" 大衆出版社 2016
• 15 溫儒敏, "新文學現實主義的流變" 北京大學出版社 2007
• 16 李允宰, "建設的 文學革命論" 2 (2): 1923
• 17 芳澤謙吉, "北京在住朝鮮人의 最近狀況 報告의 件"
• 18 木藤通譯官, "北京在住朝鮮人의 最近狀況"
• 19 김시준, "光復 以前 韓國에서의 魯迅文學과 魯迅" 29 : 1997
• 20 양건식, "中國의 思想革命과 文學革命(1)"
• 21 謝筠, "中國現代文學史敎程" 中國傳媒大學出版社 2003
• 22 丁來東, "丁來東全集 Ⅰ~Ⅲ" 금강출판사 1971
• 23 이재령, "5·4운동기 해외유학파의 서양학문 수용과 유통 －신문학을 중심으로－" 동양학연구원 (71) : 25-48, 2018
• 24 송인재, "1920, 30년대 한국 지식인의 중국 신문화운동 수용 －양건식, 정래동, 김태준의 경우－" 동아시아문화연구소 (63) : 71-97, 2015