신익성수서(申翊聖壽序)의 두 가지 독법(讀法) = A special lssue: secularization im literature, literaturization in secularity : Two reading methods of Shin, Ikseong(申翊聖)`s Su-seo(壽序: an celebratory writings for longevity)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This writing examined Nakjeondang Shin, Ikseong(樂全堂申翊聖: 1588~1644)’s Su-seo(壽序: an celebratory writings for longevity) from two viewpoints of literary history and literary value. Su-seo was popular with Jiangnan(江南) that economy of commerce developed as center as a prose pattern which appeared during the Ming Dynasty. Because it was mostly made by request and its main contents were praising living persons, it was difficult to avoid popular suspicion fundamentally. Even though Su-seo reached the position of classics by the good writers who represented the Ming Dynasty including Gui Yu-gwuang(歸有光) and Wang Shi-zhen(王世貞), it has continued to be criticized about popular veins later. On the other hand, in case of the Joseon Dynasty, Su-seo was shown from the end of 16th century to the beginning of the 17th century that literature of Former and Latter Seven Master(the restorative school, 前後七子) began to be accepted. This implies that Su-seo was shown by being influenced by the trend to learn the Ming Dynasty [學明]. Shin, Ikseong focused on Former and Latter Seven Master very much with Shin, Heum who is his father. He left 8 Su-seos which were overwhelmingly a lot of quantity then. Shin, Ikseong used various methods to prove that Su-seo is not popular. He objectified his Su-seo by showing you that he was aware of being popular on purpose and composed persons’ lives in three dimensions by adding descriptive character in them. He devised styles’ freshness by mixing genres with each other and kept classics’ categories faithfully by utilizing various authentic precedents and elaborating his style. He completed one of refined and elegant classics by expressing the world that contemporary intellectuals dreamed of with sophisticated and simple styles. There was no any direct boundary about being popular in his Su-seo not because it lack awareness about it but because awareness of traditional classics found in the process of scientific names preceded it. This point is the important meaning and limit of his Su-seo.