KCI등재
G.E. Moore의 哲學的 方法論에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Philosophical Methodology of G.E. Moore
저자
張鉉五 (釜山大學校 師範大學 國民倫理敎育科(倫理學))
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1987
작성언어
Korean
KDC
370
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
145-172(28쪽)
제공처
In this paper I intend to consider G.E. Moore's philosophical method which is scattered in all of his writings. He wrote little about his method, even though in 1942 it is given the shortest discussion of the three main topics, that is, philosophical method, ethics, and perception, his energies were given to practising, not reaching it. But I think that the main method of his philosophizing is a philosophical analysis which may be seen in the fact that he and Russell dealt severe blows to the idealistic philosophy which had dominated Britain for many years.
Especially, Moore has spent much of his life discovering and pointing out the confusion into which philosophers got when they talked about whatever they did happen to talk about. Therefore he was devoted entirely to clarifying and analyzing what other philosophers talked about. And hence he was concerned with pursuing their meaning and giving an analysis of it. The discussions of this paper may be summerized as follows:
1) The source and, in a sense, part of the direct subject master of Moore's philosophizing lie in the assertions which were made by other philosophers, not the building of the great systematic theory. And so he finds many these assertcons to be extremely peculiar and perplexing, and does his best to understand them, to analyse them, or to refute them.
Moreover, Moore was also concerned with the central matters of traditional philosophy which had been consisted of metaphysics, epistemology and ethics. The metaphysics for Moore is to show only that there are in the universe such things as physical objects, sense-data, acts of consciousness, propositions, concepts, etc. Naturally, this sort of description is not that of a consistent and unified system like traditional metaphysics.
2) One of the Moore's main philosophical method is an appeal to common sense and a use of ordinary language. In the works of the philosophers, Moore encounters various assertions which he could find no good reason to believe, assertcons which often denies what every normal man knows very to be true like McTaggart's proposition 'Time is unreal'. Over against the propounding of such strange and paradoxical assertions, Moore
insists upon uttering the statements of common sense and holds such statements to be certainly true. And again he expresses such statements as ordinary language which everyone understands very easy. Furthermore he translates monstrous assertions of idealists into ordinary language, and hence he points out and refutes inconsistencies of such assertcons.
3) The other of Moore's method is a pursuing of meaning and analysis. Moore clearly refers to two different kinds of meaning: one an ordinary, commonsensical sort of meaning, the other a technical one which involves. We often know the meaning of an expression in the first sense, even though we do not know the meaning in the second sense. But there is a lot of meaning to cover between ordinary meaning and analysis. And generally speaking, Moore's works reveals at least five meanings of meaning. They are consistently employed one or more of them are always presupposed and mentioned and discussed. Five kivds of meaning that Moore analyzes are as follow: ① the sense of an expression in ordinary parlance, ② the use of an expression, ③ the verbal definition of an expression, ④ the referent of an expression, and ⑤ analysis.
Finally, I don't think this paper throughly analyzes Moore's philosophical method. Because it is extremely analytic and entangled with many kinds of philosophical problems. And so I intend to leave a furthermore exact analysis and study about Moore's methodology as a task for the future.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)