賃借權保護에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Protection of the Right to Lease
저자
朴魯洙 (圓光大學校 大學院 法學科)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1985
작성언어
Korean
KDC
041
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
243-423(181쪽)
제공처
소장기관
1 . As the shortage of housing has become severe in urban areas due to concentrated populations, the protection of the right to lease has emerged as an important social issue, thereby exacerbating the need for the establishment of a theory regarding the protection of the right to lease. Accordingly, this thesis presents a study of the historical development of the right to lease system from the period of ancient Rome to the modern era in order to identify the dynamics of the relationship between lessee and lessor as a reflection of the society in which it exists, and to review the nature of the right to lease. In addition, this thesis reviews modern legislation, academic theories and judicial precedents to compare them to the abovementioned historical changes in the social status of lessee and lessor in order to present the nature of the right to lease which is discussed in relation to the increased trend toward protection of the right to lease.
2. In ancient Rome, the right to lease was not fully guaranteed. A lessee's possession of a leased object was not a legal right to lease but a benevolent favor granted by a lessor. Therefore, a lessee was unable to rebuff the claim of a buyer or a lessor because the latter was the very part who had granted the favor. The weakness of the right to lease in Rome was due to the lessee's social status being inferior to that of the lessor.
The Roman Empire was an ancient cosmopolitan society in which Roman citizens and the nobles held the central position in no small part because of the slavery system. By exploiting abundant materials from conquered countries, Roman citizens enjoyed a dazzling urban life. Luxurious social gatherings of the noble class and pursuit of materialistic well being were prevalent, while agricultural and manual labor, which was left to the slaves, was disregarded.
Considering such a social environment, it is not strange that the ruled lessee- an outsider of the society- was not able to enjoy the protection of the right to lease. Therefore, the ruling class's right to claim was fully guaranted under the circumstances.
In contrast, medieval German law strongly protected the right to lease. The right to lease in German society, the legal system of which was based on the equal relationship between men and was developed in the medieval cities, was different from that of Rome where a subordinate relationship existed between a lessee and a lessor.
The lessee class in German society were free citizens who had the right to vote and to become soldiers in rural areas, thus playing key roles in production activities.
The German right to lease constituted a real right in private law, which made possible the acquiring of most necessities of life in the society thereby becoming the basis of production activities.
Modern society was formed by overthrowing absolute monarchy and at¬tempted to promote the public interest with the establishment of ~he principles of free contract and of absolute right to ownership as guiding principles.
Therefore, modern private law interpreted the lease relationship in accordance with the principle of absolute right to ownership, and saw the right to lease as a restraint on that ownership.
As a strong shift toward ownership developed in modern times, the right to lease became so weakened that most modern nations considered the right to lease simply an obligatory right.
However, World war I served as a turning point in shifting the emphasis from civil law to social law, thus increasing the need to protect the right to lease.
As modern capitalism has developed, the wealth of a nation has been concentrated in a small number of capitalists. Meanwhile, most of the middle class and the poor have had to depend on capitalists for their office buildings and houses which are basic needs in life. Thus, unless the right to lease is protected, the lessee class will lose its very foundations.
In modern capitalistic society, moreover, there is no social stability without the establishment of a viable middle class. This need for social stability, coupled with the demands of the middle and lower classes. has pressured modern society into developing increased protection of the right to lease.
3. Accordingly, capitalistic nations today are attempting to strengthen the right to lease through the revision of existing law or by enacting new special laws. Academic theories and precedents are also moving toward increasing the counteracting power of the right to lease by expanding the free transfer and sublease of the right, and by placing restrictions on the termination of a contract during the contract period.
4. Finally. modern discussions about the nature of the right to lease have been centered on the trend toward the strengthening of that right, and there has been a tendency to conclude that the degree of protecting the right is determined deductively from its legal nature. But this tendency is due to the lack of understanding of the nature of the right.
The question of the protection of the right must be based on the social dynamics of the relationship bet ween a lessee and a lessor rather than being interpreted deductively by the nature of the right to lease.
5. The right to lease in each period and nation was strengthened as the lessee class emerged as a dominant power and weakened as that class lost its power in the society. In times of weakness, the right to lease was subject to the right to ownership which was regarded as the supreme right. However, when the lessee class's power was strong enough to dominate the lessor class, the lessees could deny the supremacy of ownership and thus claim their equality with the lessor. The lessee class could then reject the right to ownership and degrade ownership to a subordinate level, thus eventually expelling the lessor's control over the lessee. The lessor's right, under these circumstances, would be limited to the collection of a certain amount of rent regularly. Thus. the question of protecting the right to lease has been determined by the social dynamics of the relationship between lessee and lessor.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)