다국적 기업의 지식재산과 해외직접투자에 관한 분석: 피 투자국 지식 재산권 보호 제도의 조절효과를 중심으로 = Multinational firms’ intellectual property (IP) and FDI: The moderating role of host country IP regimes

국문 초록 (Abstract)

근접-집중 상충관계(proximity-concentration tradeoff) 이론은 기업이 현지 생산의 위치 이점(location advantage) 을 추구함에 따라 해외직접투자(foreign direct investment)에 참여한다고 본다. 한편, 다국적 기업은 국내 기업에비해 더 많은 지식 자산을 보유하고 소유권 우위를 바탕으로 해외시장에 진출하는 동시에 해외에서의 기술 유출을 우려한다. 본 분석에서는 한국 기업과 해외 관계회사 데이터를 이용해 기업의 지식 자산 수준이 수출 대비해외직접투자 의사 결정에 영향을 미치는지, 그리고 이러한 관계가 피 투자국의 지식재산권 보호 정도로부터 영향을 받는지 분석하였다. 분석 결과 지식 자산이 많은 기업일수록 지식 유출을 우려해 수출 대비 해외직접투자를 꺼려하지만, 이러한 관계는 피 투자국의 지식재산권 보호가 강할수록 완화되는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 기업이 해외직접투자의 위치 이점을 검토함에 있어 진출하고자 하는 국가의 지식재산권 보호 수준을 중요한 요인으로 본다는 것을 시사한다. 또한, 본 연구는 지식 유출의 위험이 만연하므로, 생산에 이용되는 지식이보존되는 위치가 기업의 해외 진출 방식(수출 또는 해외직접투자) 결정에 영향을 미친다고 주장한 선행연구를지지한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The proximity-concentration tradeoff theory suggests that firms choose to engage in foreign direct investment (FDI), in order to benefit from the location advantages of local production. Meanwhile, multinational firms with ownership advantages are concerned with knowledge leakage in the foreign markets. This study examines whether firm’s knowledge capital and strength of the intellectual property rights in the host country affect the firm’s decision on FDI, and this relationship is attenuated by the protection of the intellectual property rights in the host country. The results show that firms with higher patents are reluctant to invest in foreign markets, but this relationship is attenuated by the host country’s intellectual property strength. This study shows that innovative firms’ choice of FDI depends on the host countries’ IP regimes since these alter the location advantages of local production that are perceived by firms. Furthermore, this study broadly suggests that, due to knowledge leakage risks, the location of knowledge repositories required for production influences firms’ choice between foreign entry modes (exporting versus foreign direct investment), consistent with prior research.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 강석민, "기업 혁신이 수출에 미치는 영향 -국내 중소기업을 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 19 (19): 21-33, 2012
• 2 유승훈, "개발도상국 해외직접투자 유치 입지결정 요인과 중국의 상대적인 성과" 한국기업경영학회 21 (21): 21-39, 2014
• 3 Xiao, Y., "Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? The impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies" 42 (42): 749-764, 2013
• 4 Coase, R. H., "The nature of the firm" 4 (4): 386-405, 1937
• 5 Schwab, K., "The global competitiveness report 2019"
• 6 Buckley, P., "The future of the multinational enterprise" Palgrave Macmillan London 1976
• 7 Arrow, K. J., "The economic implications of learning by doing" 29 (29): 155-173, 1962
• 8 Javorcik, B. S., "The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights : Evidence from transition economies" 48 (48): 39-62, 2004
• 9 Dunning, J. H., "Some antecedents of internalization theory" 34 (34): 108-115, 2003
• 10 McCalman, P., "Protection for sale and trade liberalization : An empirical investigation" 12 (12): 81-94, 2004
• 11 Lemley, M. A., "Probabilistic patents" 19 (19): 75-98, 2005
• 12 Grzegorczyk, T., "Patents as firm’s innovativeness indicator: Advantages and disadvantages" 32 (32): 2016
• 13 Hu, A. G. Z., "Patent rights and economic growth : Evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries" 65 (65): 675-698, 2013
• 14 Bilir, L. K., "Patent laws, product life-cycle lengths, and multinational activity" 104 (104): 1979-2013, 2014
• 15 Zaheer, S., "Overcoming the liability of foreignness" 38 (38): 341-363, 1995
• 16 Desrochers, P., "On the abuse of patents as economic indicators" 1 (1): 51-74, 1998
• 17 Krugman, P., "New theories of trade among industrial countries" 73 (73): 343-347, 1983
• 18 Keller, W., "Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth : Firm level evidence from the United States" 91 (91): 821-831, 2009
• 19 Archibugi D., "Measuring the technological change through patents and innovation surveys" 16 (16): 451-468, 1996
• 20 Song, J., "MNCs during a political crisis: Issues and perspectives from the Philippine case" 9 (9): 1-16, 2003
• 21 Anton, J. J., "Little patents and big secrets : Managing intellectual property" 35 (35): 1-22, 2004
• 22 Keller, W., "Knowledge spillovers, trade, and FDI" NBER 2021
• 23 Agarwal, R., "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship" 4 (4): 271-283, 2010
• 24 Chung, W., "Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States" 48 (48): 1534-1554, 2002
• 25 Nordhaus, W. D., "Invention, growth and welfare:A theoretical treatment of technological change" MIT Press 1969
• 26 Park, W. G., "International Patent Protection : 1960–2005" 37 (37): 761-766, 2008
• 27 Hill, C., "International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace" McGraw Hill 2021
• 28 Rugman, A. M., "Internalization theory and corporate international finance" 23 (23): 73-79, 1980
• 29 Lee, J., "Intellectual property protection and U.S. foreign direct investment" 78 (78): 181-186, 1996
• 30 Hall, B. H., "Intellectual Property for Economic Development. KDI Series in Economic Policy and Development" Edward Elgar and KDI 11-32, 2014
• 31 North, D. C., "Institutions, institutional change and economic performance" Cambridge University Press 1990
• 32 Huang, K. G. L., "Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China" 28 (28): 355-377, 2017
• 33 Crescenzi, R., "Innovation catalysts : how multinationals reshape the global geography of innovation" 98 (98): 199-227, 2022
• 34 Smith, P. J., "How do foreign patent rights affect US exports, affiliate sales, and licenses?" 55 (55): 411-439, 2001
• 35 Helpman, E., "Exports versus FDI with heterogeneous firms" 94 (94): 300-316, 2004
• 36 Charnovitz, S., "Environment and health under WTO dispute settlement" 32 (32): 901-921, 1998
• 37 Romer, P. M., "Endogenous technological change" 98 (98): S71-S102, 1990
• 38 Huang, K. G. L., "Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? evidence from human genetics" 52 (52): 1193-1221, 2009
• 39 Branstetter, L. G., "Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. Firm-level panel data" 121 (121): 321-349, 2006
• 40 Arnold, J., "Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies" Deutsche Bundesbank 2006
• 41 Ginarte, J. C., "Determinants of patent rights : A cross-national study" 26 (26): 283-301, 1997
• 42 Chung, J., "Dealing with intellectual property(IP)landmines : Defensive measures to address the problem of IP access" 48 (48): 2019
• 43 Ali, I., "Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance" 4 (4): 2796-2801, 2010
• 44 BSA, "BSA Global Software Survey" The Software Alliance 2018
• 45 Brainard, L. S., "An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade" 87 (87): 520-544, 1997
• 46 Brainard, L. S., "A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration" NBER 1993
• 47 Aghion, P., "A model of growth through creative destruction" 60 (60): 323-351, 1992