KCI등재
한국 법체계에서 자유주의의 의의: 종교의 자유를 중심으로 = Political Liberalism in the Korean Legal System: Focused on Freedom of Religion
저자
이정훈 (울산대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2010
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
113-146(34쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
2
제공처
소장기관
Freedom of Religion is a key principle that supports spiritual freedom of humans who possess divine nature and intelligence. Humankind has made many sacrifices for freedom of religion, and in the Western political history, ‘freedom’ and ‘religion’ have been settled in the liberal-democratic constitutional systems as exchanging both positive and negative effects with each other. In East Asia, especially in Korea, Buddhism and Neo-Confucianism were accepted and maintained from a nationalistic perspective before modernization. Christianity that was embraced by the Enlightenment Party also had strong nationalistic overtones due to the limitation of the embracers who were under the influence of Confucian ideas. For all ages and countries, religion has its historical background that can serve as a barometer for discussions on the freedom of a society. Accordingly, this study examined liberalism in the Korean legal system, with the keyword “religion”.
As reviewed above, in its legal reality, Korean society has not experienced the Western liberalistic individualism that communitarianism targets for criticizing, historically considered. This study diagnosed that Confucian ideas that have influenced Korean society was closer to nationalism than to communitarianism, and Korean nationalism, which was influenced by Japanese ultra-statism, was reinforced by dictatorial governments after liberation and has had a strong impact on overall Korean society.
This study intended to argue that the problem that the Korean legal reality is facing is not to seek an alternative to liberalism, but to expand the instrumental political order of liberalism that guarantees freedoms and rights of individuals so that it can ensure freedoms and rights of disadvantaged individuals and eliminate the shadow of nationalism from the legal reality. This study also verified that the idea “Confucian communitarianism” was unsubstantial.
In addition, this study identified the shadow of nationalism as a code of illiberalism in cases of conscientious objection to military service and argued that the judiciary should aim for a liberal-democratic constitutional order through rulings based on a liberalist view of justice, going against the influence of nationalism.
This study also defined that pluralism as a neutral attitude toward good can be magnified as a strength of liberalism and it should be pursued as a political value that guarantees freedoms and rights of minorities from suppression and coercion of religious groups or majorities ruling religious hegemony. The principle of tolerance for minorities, who have different thoughts and values from the majority of members of society, should be realized in the legal reality with the purpose of the assimilative national unity, which will enhance the ideological justification and superiority of liberal democracy. The morality of liberalism lies in guarantees of rights of minorities and the disadvantaged, based on the tolerance and understanding.
Freedom of Religion is a key principle that supports spiritual freedom of humans who possess divine nature and intelligence. Humankind has made many sacrifices for freedom of religion, and in the Western political history, ‘freedom’ and ‘religion’ have been settled in the liberal-democratic constitutional systems as exchanging both positive and negative effects with each other. In East Asia, especially in Korea, Buddhism and Neo-Confucianism were accepted and maintained from a nationalistic perspective before modernization. Christianity that was embraced by the Enlightenment Party also had strong nationalistic overtones due to the limitation of the embracers who were under the influence of Confucian ideas. For all ages and countries, religion has its historical background that can serve as a barometer for discussions on the freedom of a society. Accordingly, this study examined liberalism in the Korean legal system, with the keyword “religion”.
As reviewed above, in its legal reality, Korean society has not experienced the Western liberalistic individualism that communitarianism targets for criticizing, historically considered. This study diagnosed that Confucian ideas that have influenced Korean society was closer to nationalism than to communitarianism, and Korean nationalism, which was influenced by Japanese ultra-statism, was reinforced by dictatorial governments after liberation and has had a strong impact on overall Korean society.
This study intended to argue that the problem that the Korean legal reality is facing is not to seek an alternative to liberalism, but to expand the instrumental political order of liberalism that guarantees freedoms and rights of individuals so that it can ensure freedoms and rights of disadvantaged individuals and eliminate the shadow of nationalism from the legal reality. This study also verified that the idea “Confucian communitarianism” was unsubstantial.
In addition, this study identified the shadow of nationalism as a code of illiberalism in cases of conscientious objection to military service and argued that the judiciary should aim for a liberal-democratic constitutional order through rulings based on a liberalist view of justice, going against the influence of nationalism.
This study also defined that pluralism as a neutral attitude toward good can be magnified as a strength of liberalism and it should be pursued as a political value that guarantees freedoms and rights of minorities from suppression and coercion of religious groups or majorities ruling religious hegemony. The principle of tolerance for minorities, who have different thoughts and values from the majority of members of society, should be realized in the legal reality with the purpose of the assimilative national unity, which will enhance the ideological justification and superiority of liberal democracy. The morality of liberalism lies in guarantees of rights of minorities and the disadvantaged, based on the tolerance and understanding.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-05-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Philosophy -> Korean Journal of Legal Philosophy | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2005-05-31 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Philosophy | KCI등재 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.76 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.66 | 0.64 | 1.024 | 0.18 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)