동아시아 문화교류(文化交流)와 한국한문학(韓國漢文學) ; 구한말 동아시아 지식인의 문화비전 -창강 김택영을 중심으로- = The Cultural Vision of Intellectuals at The end of The Korean Empire -With Focus on Changkang, Kim Taekyoung-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Changkang(滄江), Kim Taekyoung(金澤榮, 1850~1927) was born in good family in Kaesung and selected by Kim Hongjib(金弘集) as an edit of the National History Compilation Bureau, where he participated in compilation of history books. Then he moved to Nantong(南通), China in September, 1905, just before the conclusion of the Eulsa Protection Treaty and have lived there for 22 years. He had maintained Korean nationality until January, 1912. then acquired Chinese nationality. clearly defining his moral obligation about the pursuit of his learning. He published 『Gubendaxuezhanggou(古本大學章句)』 in October. 1913 and 『Hanshiqi(韓史경)』 later in the same year. In these two books, he put all of his ideas for the Characteristics of cultural vision which he had systematized through the historical transitional period of the Eastern Asia such as the Annexation of Korea and the Revolution of China. Kim Taekyoung thought that Confucius corrected the mistakes in the Chinese classics at the end of the Joo dynasty, and The Confucius`s orthodoxy was succeeded by Liuxiang(劉向) and Liuxin(劉歆), the father and son, who were systematized the study for the Chinese classics, He insisted Chengzi(程子) hadn`t write Gewezhizhizhang(格物致知章) at the first but Joohee supplemented it later in his 『Gubendaxuezhanggou』 based on his thought about the Chinese classics. He saw one of the main reasons of the fall of the Chosun dynasty was the slanted scholastic climate to Zhuzixue(朱子學) and throughly denied Geweshuo(格物說), the most important theory to build up the Zhuzi(朱子) philosophy, which had provided the scholastic foundation for Chosun about for 500 years. This shook not only the faith of the succession of the moral philosophy by Zhuzixue but also the lawfulness of the sovereign order by Chosun which had been farmed on the basis of Zhuzixue. Kim Taekyoung understood the period of the Three Kingdoms as the early era civilization which Zhi(質) was superior to Wen(文), Chosun as the last era civilization which Wen was superior to Zhi and Wen, Koryo as the middle era civilization which Wen and Zhi made a good harmony. He extensively contradicted the legitimacy of the Chosun dynasty, making the Wihwa Island withdrawal of troops an object of criticism with no hesitation, based on this historical point of view in his book, 『Hanshiqi』 He grasped that the Koryo dynasty had harmonized Wen and Zhi so that it could complete the political ideas of the both Hans, Donghan(東漢) and Xian(西漢) and the Three Great dynasties, the Ha dynasty, the Eun dynasty. the Joo(周) dynasty. He intensively criticized the misgovernment of the successive kings of Chosun and the evil effects of the faction political affairs and attacked the legitimacy of the Chosun dynasty which had started from the Wiwha Island withdrawal of troops. Kim Taekyoung depended his scholastic knowledge of his life time upon the Chinese sages. Therefore he thought the only way to solve the problems that the Asian countries of the time were confronted was the recovery of the politics of the both Hans and the Three Great Kingdoms of China. His two books, 『Gubendaxuezhanggou』 and ``Hanshiqis. were published in the practicing process of his cultural vision of the reactionary tendency, Re wanted to fight against the power of the West with the morality of the sages. His cultural vision with the reactionism shows us symbolically that the Chinese classics put a period to the historical mission despite of its importance in the Chinese and Korean literature for several thousand years.