선진국가로의 발전을 위한 헌법의 새 틀 모색

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The current constitution was a product of `Year of 87 Regime`, which means an overall social phenomenon formed throughout the comprehensive uprising by Korean people in the year of 1987. Thereafter Korean society has enormously changed. Globalization based on neo-liberalism has penetrated into it in the opportunity of financial crisis starting 1997, when Korean economic policy was almost entirely mandated to IMF. And multi racial, multi cultural tendency has been promoted. Democratization of internal society done through NGOs` rapid grown-ups and active movements by labor unions, has been a great source of inspiration to Korean people. In addition, inter-Korean relation, the relation between South and North Korea has been dramatically improved, which resulted in the wide range of easing of tensions. These changes were not on the hole imaginable at the time of the `Year of 87 Regime`. It means that the alienation between Constitution-Norm and Constitution-Reality is so deep that Constitution-Norm can`t accommodate Constitution-Reality adequately. In such a time we naturally fall into a consideration of the amendment of constitution. Many social scientists agree on that. And many leaders in Korean society especially in political area seem to start voicing the necessity of constitutional amendment. If we must consider the amendment of constitution, what should be the contents of it? I`d like to mention them divided in 3 categories. First of all, it should be considered we have to indulge ourselves in the wave of globalization, which is not an option but is an dispensible must for Koreans. And it is desirable for us to do our best for international responsibilities imposed upon us. In internal matters, we should dare to take a sword to cut out cronyism that is unfortunately prevalent in Korean society enough to make many examples of injustice. And the defeated in the market system are also beings with dignity to be respected at all times. So in our actual policies such a person always is taken care of in a way of implementation of `Warmer Free-Market Economy`. Furthermore, the problems of local autonomy and the style of government system, the latter of which always has been a hot potato in the discussions of constitutional amendment, are also seriously to be deliberated. And the conspicuous social changes, one of which is so-called `digital revolution` are sure to be included in the contents of amendment. We could say these days are in the process of union of South and North Korea undoubtedly. In this point of view, we need to be looking into the constitutional amendment, specifically to say, in the matter of the style of government system. If so, the parliamentary cabinet system might be preferred than that of the presidential government. Needless to say, the amendment of constitution is not a resolver for all the social problems. But we could say that setting up the national agendas by installation in constitution is the most effective way to solve them. Therefore we should tackle the constitutional amendment in this opportunity of time when social consensus for it is in general being made to make a true advanced country.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김효전, "헌법의 개념사" 동아대학교 법과대학 2008
• 2 김형성, "헌법개정의 과제와 전망" 한국헌법학회 12 (12): 2006
• 3 한국헌법학회, "헌법개정연구" 2006헌법개정연구위원회 2006
• 4 최봉석, "지방자치의 보장을 위한 헌법개정의 과제, 대한민국 선진화를 위한 바람직한 헌법개정 방향" 한국선진화정책학회 2008
• 5 권영설, "주요 쟁점으로 본 우리 정치과정의 헌법문제" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 2007
• 6 김용호, "정치선진화를 위한 헌법개정 방향: 공화주의 강화방안" 한국선진화정책학회 2008
• 7 신우철, "정부형태, 과연 바꾸어야 하는가?" 국회 선진헌법연구회 5 (5): 2005
• 8 채형복, "유럽헌법조약" 높이깊이 2006
• 9 신평, "박정희 시대의 사법부, 그에 대한 헌법적 성찰" 한국공법학회 31 (31): 2002
• 10 Paul Crugman, "미래를 말하다" 현대경제연구원북스 2008
• 11 음선필, "대통령선거 및 국회의원 선거의 선거주기-정치권력의 시간적 배분" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 2007
• 12 정태호, "대통령 임기제 헌법개정의 필요성과 정당성" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 2007
• 13 김종철, "대통령 4년 연임제 ‘원 포인트’개헌론에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 2007
• 14 명재진, "국무총리제의 합리적 운용의 한계와 개헌필요성" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 2007
• 15 민경국, "경제선진화를 위한 헌법개정 방향, 대한민국선진화를 위한 바람직한 헌법개정방향" 한국선진화정책학회 2008
• 16 Guy Sorman, "경제는 거짓말을 하지 않는다" 문학세계사 2008
• 17 박노자, "개화기의 국민담론과 그 속의 타자들,근대 계몽기 지식개념의 수용과 그 변용" 이화여대 한국문화연구원 2004
• 18 임지봉, "개헌의 바람직한 방향 ― 정부의 개헌시안에 대한 비판적 분석과 기본권규정 개정을 중심으로 ―" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 327-360, 2007
• 19 "각종 국내 헌법교과서"
• 20 "www.immigration.go.kr"
• 21 "http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/news/20080606-OYT1T00276.htm"
• 22 "http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3867787.ece"
• 23 "http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90309565"
• 24 "http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89064840"
• 25 "http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89022300"
• 26 "http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88960496"
• 27 "http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88827012"
• 28 "http://www.migrant.or.kr/bbs/view.php?id=migrant3&page=1&sn1=&divpage=1&category=2&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=471"
• 29 "http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=15864"
• 30 "http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/05/113_24410.html"
• 31 "http://www.donga.com/fbin/output?n=200805240149"
• 32 "http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LS2D&mid=sec&sid1=103&sid2=336&oid=001&aid=0002093810"
• 33 "http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200702140754041&code=210000"
• 34 "http://news.joins.com/article/3150413.html?ctg=1102"
• 35 "http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2008/05/19/2008051901650.html"
• 36 "http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:SOM:EN:HTML"
• 37 "http://article.joins.com/article/article.asp?total_id=3179302젨젨"
• 38 "http://article.joins.com/article/article.asp?total_id=3179280?"
• 39 "http://article.joins.com/article/article.asp?ctg=2001&Total_ID=3161644"
• 40 "http://100.naver.com/print_100.php?id=768277"
• 41 신평, "21세기 한국 법조의 바람직한 방향" 한국비교공법학회 7 (7): 2006