부산대학교도서관 교육학장서 연구 = (A) study on the education collection of the Pusan national university library

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is aimed at setting an example of the most relevant method of collection development to Korean University Libraries. Researcher practiced experimental study at a standpoint of librarian who, generally, has no specific subject background. Until now University libraries´ collections are not developed but accumulated. It is an undeniable fact.
In this situation the vest work we can or should do for collection development is to understand present collection and it´s user situation correctly. It is the first step for systematic collection development.
And this study accomplished as case study. The case choosed for research is Education Collection of Pusan National University Library.
This study can be classified as qualitative research. Researcher analyze user structure and collection situation descriptively based on the empirical materials produced by the University authorities, departmental office and library.
This study made up of four parts as follow:
1. User analysis
Researcher analyze history of department, curriculums of not only undergraduate but also graduate course and research tendency of graduate students and faculty.
2. Present collection analysis
In this part, firstly, whole education collection analysed statistically according to sub-subject, publication year, language etc. secondly, surveied the usefulness of collection by checking reference lists which related to every user levels and interview with students, faculty and librarians.
3. Factors of present collection building analysis
The analysis about factors of present collection building is performed based on the survey of empirical resources and interview with students, faculty and librarians.
4. Setting an example of Collection Development Policy Statement Researcher tried to set an example of Collection Development Policy Statement. It is, of course, descriptive and a part of Collection Development Policy Statement every local University library should have.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• -목차-
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 문제제기와 연구목적 = 1
• 2. 연구내용과 연구방법 = 6
• 3. 연구대상 = 12
• 4. 선행연구 = 13
• Ⅱ. 교과과정과 이용자 분석 = 24
• 1. 부산대학교 교육학의 역사 = 24
• 2. 교과과정 분석 = 27
• 가. 학부과정 = 27
• 나. 대학원과정 = 32
• 3. 이용자 분석 = 37
• 가. 학부·대학원과정 = 38
• 나. 교수진 = 41
• Ⅲ. 장서 분석 = 42
• 1. 양적 분석 = 43
• 가. 통계적 분석 = 43
• 1) 단행본 = 44
• ① 세부주제 분석 = 45
• ② 언어분석 = 50
• ③ 문헌연령 분석 = 53
• ④ 번역서 분석 = 55
• 2) 연속간행물 = 56
• ① 종류 분석 = 57
• ② 주제 분석 = 61
• 3) 참고자료 = 62
• 4) 비도서자료 = 70
• 나. 장서기준과의 비교 = 71
• 1) 법규 = 71
• 2) 한국도서관기준 = 73
• 2. 이용수준별 장서 유용성 분석 = 75
• 가. 학부수준의 장서 유용성 = 77
• 나. 대학원수준의 장서 유용성 = 81
• 다. 교수수준의 장서 유용성 = 87
• Ⅳ. 현 장서구성의 영향요인 분석 = 93
• 1. 도서관 요인 = 93
• 가. 장서개발규정 = 93
• 나. 사서 = 101
• 다. 자료구입예산 = 109
• 2. 이용자요인 = 111
• 가. 교수 = 111
• 나. 학생 = 115
• Ⅴ. 장서개발지침과 후속연구를 위한 논의 = 121
• 1. 교육학 장서개발지침 = 121
• 2. 후속연구를 위한 논의 = 125
• 참고문헌 = 129
• 영문초록 = 135
• 부록 = 137